Home » Uncategorized » When & Why Executive Coaching Fails: Lessons from the Asian Context
Learn continually – there’s always “one more thing” to learn! – Steve Jobs
Coaching, when done right, unlocks potential, boosts performance, and drives lasting change. However, in many Asian contexts, coaching can fail spectacularly. Despite good intentions, cultural dynamics, organizational habits, and leadership mindsets often collide with coaching principles. Understanding when and why coaching fails here offers valuable lessons for leaders, HR professionals, and coaches alike.
In many Asian countries like Japan, China, and India, respect for hierarchy is deeply ingrained. Employees are taught from a young age to defer to authority figures, whether teachers, parents, or bosses. In a coaching relationship where openness and vulnerability are essential, this can be a massive obstacle.
For example, in a large Japanese multinational, an external coach struggled to get honest feedback from mid-level managers. Even when asked reflective questions, managers provided “safe” answers they thought the coach (and by extension, senior leadership) wanted to hear. Fear of “losing face” or offending authority figures suppressed authentic dialogue, rendering the coaching sessions superficial.
Why it failed: Coaching requires vulnerability, but hierarchical cultures often discourage speaking candidly to perceived authority figures.
Coaching success depends heavily on clear, aligned objectives. In Asian corporations, particularly family-owned businesses in Southeast Asia, hidden agendas often derail this alignment.
Take the case of a Singaporean tech firm where a mid-level manager was assigned an executive coach. Officially, the goal was to “prepare him for leadership.” Unofficially, senior management saw the coaching as a polite way to ease him out. The coachee, sensing the lack of sincerity, became defensive, distrusting both the coach and the process.
Why it failed: Coaching was used as a tool for passive-aggressive management, not genuine development, leading to mistrust and disengagement.
In many Asian workplaces, especially in traditional industries like banking or manufacturing in India or Malaysia, coaching is sometimes perceived as remedial — something offered only when performance dips.
For instance, a high-performing salesperson in Mumbai was “offered” coaching after a slight dip in quarterly numbers. She interpreted it as a sign that leadership had lost confidence in her. Her motivation plummeted, and she ultimately resigned, feeling stigmatized.
Why it failed: Coaching was poorly positioned. Instead of being seen as a tool for growth, it became a signal of failure.
Coaching demands self-reflection, openness to feedback, and willingness to change — qualities not always immediately embraced in fast-paced, output-driven Asian economies.
In a fast-growing startup in Vietnam, young managers were provided with coaches. However, many saw the sessions as a waste of time compared to “getting real work done.” Without readiness or a growth mindset, even the best coaching frameworks fall flat.
Why it failed: The coachees were not mentally or emotionally ready for coaching. Without buy-in, coaching becomes a tick-box exercise.
While English is often the business language across Asia, nuances can be lost, especially in countries like Thailand, Korea, and China where indirect communication is the norm. Western-trained coaches sometimes misinterpret silence, politeness, or ambiguity.
A Thai executive repeatedly responded to tough questions with “I will consider it” — a polite way of declining. The coach mistook this as openness to change. Months later, no progress was made.
Why it failed: A lack of cultural and linguistic sensitivity led to misreading important cues, causing coaching efforts to drift.
Coaching can be transformative, but not without understanding the cultural nuances of Asia. It fails when hierarchy stifles honesty, when coaching is weaponized, when it’s seen as punishment, when readiness is lacking, or when communication is mishandled.
The best coaches operating in Asia tailor their approach, build trust carefully, position coaching as a privilege, and ensure all parties are aligned. Above all, they show deep respect for the culture while gently challenging individuals to step beyond their comfort zones — because that’s where true growth happens.
✅ 1. Hierarchical Culture Blocks Honesty
→ Coachees fear “losing face” and give safe, non-transparent answers.
✅ 2. Misaligned Goals
→ Hidden agendas between organization, coach, and coachee lead to distrust.
✅ 3. Coaching Seen as Punishment
→ Coaching offered only after problems arise makes it feel like a stigma.
✅ 4. Lack of Coaching Readiness
→ Coachees don’t see the value or are too busy to reflect and grow.
✅ 5. Language and Communication Gaps
→ Misreading indirect communication causes misunderstandings.
✨ Build trust slowly and deeply.
✨ Align goals openly with all parties.
✨ Position coaching as a reward, not a remedy.
✨ Assess and prepare coachee readiness first.
✨ Stay culturally and linguistically sensitive.
Comment: Is there any tip/hack that you have personally used in order to learn things quickly which has not been covered in this blog?
Let me know in the comment section below, I would love to hear your stories.
Share This Post, Choose Your Platform!